Often is his gold complexion dimmed...

Zetalux 7W light bulbA package arrived today; a small but heavy one, containing my first LED lightbulbs. No, not the little ones that go in torches, but big ones designed to replace the 240v tungsten bulbs in my ceiling light fixtures. Michael had found a good UK supplier, and I wanted to experiment with what I'm sure will be the way we all light our homes five to ten years from now.

As I've written before, I don't really like the CFL (compact fluorescent lamp) bulbs that have been the only real low-energy option in the past. You know, the ones that look like some sort of lower intestine curled up where the bulb should be? Firstly, they're a nasty colour, though much improved now. Secondly, they take a while to warm up to full brightness. Thirdly, they may use less power but they contain nasty chemicals which leads some people to question how environmentally friendly they are overall, and lastly, you can't use them with dimmer switches, which rules them out for about half of the rooms in my house. Not just dimmers, either, some other electronic switches (like electronic timers) also don't work. I've put a couple of these bulbs in, and I've sort of become used to them, but it's really a case of how much I'm willing to sacrifice for my moral obligations, rather than something I do with joy.

LED-based bulbs, on the other hand, use even less power, are probably more environmentally friendly to manufacture, supposedly last for somewhere between twenty and forty years, and are available in dimmable form. It was time to try them, so I ordered three different ones, even though they cost £25-£35 each. So, after a quick try, what's the verdict?

Well, the good news is that the brightness is really quite impressive. Anything over about 4W is a viable replacement for a 50-60W bulb, so, yes, they use about 10% of the power of a conventional bulb, and about half that of a CFL. These are also well-made, as they should be for that price. In five years' time, when we're buying cheap LED bulbs for a few quid, we'll be amazed at the robust construction techniques used today. They hit full brightness immediately and the dimmable one worked nicely with my dimmers. All good so far.

However, I'm not sure that any of them will find a permanent home in my light fixtures yet.

Firstly, they're too white. They don't have the bluey-green tint of some CFLs, but they are still very white. This may be something I'll get used to over time, but if you're thinking of buying any, be aware that those labelled 'warm white' are still not nearly as warm as a tungsten bulb. They're fine if you're keen to simulate daylight in your sub-basement, but not if you're after that cozy, welcome-you-home-on-a-cold-winter's-night look. Particularly if you mix LEDs and traditional bulbs in the same room, you'll notice the difference. Fortunately, manufacturers and suppliers are starting to publish the colour temperatures - don't trust anything described as 'warm' if its temperature is over 2800K, and even 2800K leaves something to be desired.

But that's not the main issue. The main issue is that, while a glowing filament emits light in all directions, LEDs are very directional. They therefore make good spotlights, which is why LED bulbs have chiefly been sold with GU10 connectors, as used by the little spotlights that have been embedded in everyone's ceilings in recent years. There, I can imagine they work well, and are worthwhile because, charming as those lights are, they're not a very efficient way to light a room. When my existing GU10 bulbs give up the ghost, I'll replace them with LEDs. But most of my house has light fixtures - some of them antique - which make it rather obvious if only the top half of the bulb is emitting light and most of that light goes in one direction. The very unexciting paper globe shade above me, which I've been planning to replace for about 7 years, if fitted with an LED, does a very good job of lighting the floor in the middle of my small study but leaves the periphery in shadow. The main glass fitting in the centre of the dining room has two bulbs, side by side, mounted horizontally. With LED bulbs, this lights up the walls but not, to any great degree, the table. It looks very strange.

Until this is sorted, I'd need two or three times as many lights in every room to get reasonable coverage, which undoes some of the benefits. CFLs are better, but I can't use those because of my dimmer switches. And the 7W bulb pictured above, which was intended to go in an Ikea R80 spotlight fitting at about eye-level on the kitchen wall, is a good, bright bulb but I can't use it because it's the wrong shape: the dome of the bulb extends beyond the lampshade and so is dazzling. Ironically, the one good spotlight-based experiment fails because the bulb sends light in directions I don't want it to go!

So, my advice is, if you're willing to pay a lot, these bulbs are starting to become quite good. But unless you're planning to use them as ceiling-recessed spots, you may need to budget for new light fittings as well. Still, look on the, ahem, bright side. At least the fittings may cost you less than your lightbulbs!

Abseiling before the wind

ropeaccessEveryone who has a hobby must at some point think, "I wonder if I could make a living doing this?"

The NYT has a great article (and video) about a new opportunity being offered by the growth in wind turbines. Sounds like fun!

For this job, though, you may need a certificate from the Society of Professional Rope Access Technicians. There are some wonderful organisations out there, don't you think?

Regressive progress?

I forget who said that the great thing about the mobile phone network was that it had lowered people's expectations of telephony to the point where internet calls were now feasible...

I couldn't help thinking of this while looking at the map of the UK's planned switchover to all-digital TV. When I upgraded my aerial a couple of years ago to allow me to do digital stuff, it made such a difference to my analogue picture that the digital signal, while good, is now definitely inferior. And I have a top-line TV with a high-quality digital tuner, but I am still aware of slight digital artefacts which are more annoying than any analogue noise. Most of our TV-watching is, actually, digital, because we store everything to disk and watch it later, but on the rare occasions when we watch anything live - during Wimbledon, for example - we always prefer the analogue signal. This is because I now have very good reception, but ironically, people at the other extreme - in remote far-flung parts of the country with very poor coverage - will have the opposite problem of not being able to get a digital signal at all.

Often, apparent drops in quality can be explained by Clayton Christensen's idea of disruptive technology: examples include audiophile hi-fi CD systems being replaced by MP3 players, gigabit ethernet connections proving less popular than wifi, and so forth... The original metric that was used by customers to judge a technology's value is suddenly replaced by a different one and all those who had striven for constant improvement on one axis suddenly have to change direction. The companies that can move fast are generally the winners.

That's not really the case for the Digital TV switchover. With classic disruptive technology examples, it's generally the customer who suddenly realises that he wants something different from technology and is willing to put up with a compromise elsewhere in order to get it. Here, it's not clear to me that many consumers really want digital TV; this is being driven by the industry, which will make it a much harder sell. And it means that it's the responsibility of the industry to provision the system appropriately so that customers aren't let down by 'progress'.

I'm still keen on the switch to digital, because I know what it will let me do on my hard disk, and I appreciate the value of reclaiming large chunks of the frequency spectrum. For me, these are a higher priority than smooth high-speed motion when watching sports footage. But I can't help feeling I'm probably in a minority here!

Still, perhaps the great thing about YouTube will prove to be that it lowered our expectations of video to the point where terrestrial digital TV was not too much of a let-down.

I, Tilly

Hello, everyone, I’m Tilly!

IMG_0899

I came to live with Quentin and Rose just a week ago, and they haven’t had any time for blog posts since!

IMG_0896

I was allowed to go out in the big wide world for the first time yesterday, and it’s a very strange place – all white and cold! But I can bite lots of it, so that’s good.

It looks as if there’s a very big world out there to explore!

IMG_0893

But exploring too much of it is very exhausting so I need to have a snooze afterwards.

IMG_0908

Drive to live

I've been replacing the hard drive on my Mac Mini, the one that runs my TV. Mac Minis are not easy beasts to disassemble, and it's something which could be a fairly daunting process were it not for the wealth of information online from those who have walked this path before.

Fortunately, the disk which died had little on it that was of importance. All the past episodes of Frasier and Poirot are stored on a separate drive! But fixing it has still been time-consuming. It brought home once again the message that all hard disks die. In particular, as we strive for ever-smaller devices, the 2.5in 'laptop' drives are becoming ever more popular, and these die much more frequently than their larger counterparts. Many of them will last for 10 years. Some will turn up their little tootsies after 6 months. But they will all go in the end.

So look around your house or office and consider your backup strategies. The question to ask yourself is "What will I do when this machine dies and all the data goes away?"

Go on. Do it now, because it might happen this afternoon. Start with the machine you're using to read this post. And note the 'when'. If we are tempted to say if, as the old saying goes, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is not in us.

What will I do when this machine dies and all the data goes away?

RSS to Mail

If you're not very good at checking your RSS feed reader, but understandably can't bear to miss a post on Status-Q, you could try a service like FeedMyInbox, which takes RSS feeds and send them to you by mail. Seems to work very nicely.

You can sign up for Status-Q feeds here:

Email Address:

Powered by Feed My Inbox