This, I think, is quite fabulous. A jazz rendition of the Dr Who theme, by Bill Bailey.
When I was an undergraduate studying Computer Science, in the late 80s, the course was accredited by the British Computer Society on the condition that, as part of the syllabus, we were taught some COBOL. For those who have not encountered it, COBOL – the Common Business Oriented Language – is a very early programming language designed with the idea, amongst other things, that managers and other non-technical business types should be able to read and understand it.
In retrospect this wasn’t really a great idea (any more than it was when Apple tried something similar with AppleScript in 1993). Computer languages tend to get a kind of uncanny valley problem when you try to pretend that machines speak the same way as humans; the results are neither good English nor good programming languages. It’s a bit like Franglais, except that Franglais is enjoyable to use.
But COBOL can be forgiven; this was after all still 1959, and the world’s experience in programming languages was somewhat limited. It was designed by people as eminent as Grace Hopper (who was brilliant at handling David Letterman, as well as computers!). And COBOL was incredibly successful – for some decades it was the most-used computer language, and it’s still in use today, though it’s bizarre to discover there are people doing .NET programming with it.
Anyway, it was Dr Frank King who taught us most of our languages, and since he had to include a bit of COBOL, he did it mostly as a joke, starting with a properly-constructed “Hello World” program, which I seem to recall was 77 lines long.
At the end of the final lecture, he handed out photocopies of “The Common Business Oriented Goldilocks”, which had been published in Datamation magazine back in 1968, and which is written in something approaching valid COBOL. Maybe it is valid COBOL… I never wrote another line of COBOL after that lecture, so don’t remember. But I may have readers who do!
THE COMMON BUSINESS ORIENTED GOLDILOCKS --- ------ -------- -------- ---------- IDENTIFICATION DIVISON. PROGRAM ID. A COBOL FABLE. SECURITY. INSECURE. PROGRAMMER-ID. ARTHUR SHAPIRO. REMARKS. SLIGHTLY MORE MANGLED VERSION OF ONE IN JAN., 1968 DATAMATION. DATE WRITTEN. ONCE UPON A TIME. ENVIRONMENT DIVISON. CONFIGURATION SECTION. OBJECT COMPUTER. ANY MUSIC BOX, MEMORY SIZE 8X64 BYTES, 19 TAPE DRIVES, 11 DISK DRIVES, 1 GOLDILOCKS, 3 BEARS. INPUT-OUTPUT SECTION. FILE-CONTROL. SELECT TAPE DRIVES, ASSIGN THEM TO CREDITOR. SELECT DISK DRIVES. SELECT GOLDILOCKS, SELECT BEARS, ASSIGN TO ONE COTTAGE. I-O CONTROL. APPLY RED TAPE TO TAPE DRIVES, APPLY BRAHMS RECORD TO DISK DRIVE, APPLY GOLDI, BEARS TO COTTAGE. DATA DIVISON. FD GOLDI. LABEL RECORDS ARE STANDARD VALUE OF IDENTIFACTION IS "GOLDILOCKS" DATA RECORD IS GOLDILOCKS. 01 GOLDILOCKS. 02 HGT SIZE IS 62 INS. 02 WGT SIZE IS 110 LBS. 02 VITAL-STATS. 03 B 38. 03 W 24. 03 H 36. 02 RATING 100%. FD THREE-BEARS. LABEL RECORDS ARE STANDARD VALUE OF IDENTIFICATION IS "BEARS" DATA RECORDS ARE DADDY-BEAR, MUMMY-BEAR, BABY-BEAR. 01 DADDY-BEAR. 02 HGT 70 INS. 02 WGT 750 LBS. 02 COLOR-OF-EYES BLOODSHOT. 02 DISPOSITION UNBEARABLE. 01 MUMMY-BEAR. 02 HGT 65 INS. 02 WGT 700 LBS. 02 COLOR-OF-EYES BLUE. 02 DISPOSITION BEARABLE. 01 BABY-BEAR. 02 HGT 40 INS. 02 DISPOSITION INFANTILE. WORKING-STORAGE SECTION. 01 COTTAGE PICTURE IS COZY. 02 KITCHEN. 03 TABLE SIZE IS LARGE, VALUE IS 1. 03 CHAIRS SIZE IS MEDIUM, VALUE IS 3. 02 PORRIDGE. 03 KING-SIZE OCCURS 1 TIME. 03 QUEEN-SIZE OCCURS 1 TIME. 03 PRINCE-SIZE OCCURS 1 TIME. 02 DOOR SIZE IS USUAL, VALUE IS OPEN. 02 BEDROOM. 03 BED. 04 LARGE OCCURS 1 TIME. 04 MEDIUM OCCURS 1 TIME. 04 SMALL OCCURS 1 TIME. 03 WINDOW SIZE IS SMALL, VALUE IS OPEN. 01 CORRECT-COTTAGE REDEFINES COTTAGE, VALUE IS SAME. 77 KING-SIZE-BED-SLEPT-IN SIZE IS BIG, VALUE IS ROCK-BOTTOM. 77 QUEEN-SIZE-BED-SLEPT-IN SIZE IS MEDIUM, VALUE IS DEPRESSED. 77 NO-PORRIDGE SIZE IS SMALL, VALUE IS ZERO. 77 SIP SIZE IS LITTLE, VALUE IS "SSSLURP". 77 SLUMBERLAND SIZE IS UNLIMITED, VALUE IS ZZZZZZZZZ. CONSTANT SECTION. 01 COMMENT1 SIZE IS 36, VALUE IS "SOMEBODY HAS BEEN EATING MY PORRIDGE". 01 COMMENT2 SIZE IS 36, VALUE IS "SOMEBODY HAS BEEN SLEEPING IN MY BED". PROCEDURE DIVISION. FOREST SECTION. START-OF-TALE. OPEN STORY. READ FOLLOWING. FIRST-MOVE. MOVE GOLDILOCKS TO COTTAGE. IF DOOR IS CLOSED OR BEARS ARE GREATER THAN ZERO ALTER ENTER-GO3 PROCEED TO HASTY-RETREAT. ENTER-GOLDILOCKS. GO TO KITCHEN-SCENE. KITCHEN-SCENE. IF PORRIDGE IS KING-SIZE, PERFORM TASTE-ROUTINE VARYING PORRIDGE- KING-SIZE BY 1 UNTIL PORRIDGE EQUALS PRINCE-SIZE OTHERWISE COMPUTE IF COTTAGE = CORRECT-COTTAGE GO TO BEDROOM-SCENE. TASTE-ROUTINE. SUBTRACT SIP FROM PORRIDGE(KING-SIZE). SUBTRACT SIP FROM PORRIDGE(QUEEN-SIZE). SUBTRACT SIP FROM PORRIDGE(PRINCE-SIZE) GIVING NO-PORRIDGE. BEDROOM-SCENE. MOVE GOLDILOCKS TO BEDROOM. ADD GOLDILOCKS TO BED(LARGE). DISPLAY "IT IS TOO HARD". SUBTRACT GOLDILOCKS FROM BED(LARGE) GIVING KING-SIZE-BED-SLEPT-IN. MOVE GOLDILOCKS TO BED(MEDIUM). DISPLAY "IT IS TOO SOFT". SUBTRACT GOLDILOCKS FROM BED(MEDIUM) GIVING OUEEN-SIZE-BED-SLEPT-IN. MOVE GOLDILOCKS TO BED(SMALL). DISPLAY "IT IS JUST RIGHT". ADD GOLDILOCKS TO SLUMBERLAND. BEARS-RETURN. MOVE DADDY-BEAR, MUMMY-BEAR, BABY-BEAR TO KITCHEN. MOVE CORRESPONDING BEARS TO PORRIDGE. DISPLAY "DADDY BEAR ", COMMENT1. DISPLAY "MUMMY BEAR ", COMMENT1. DISPLAY "BABY BEAR ", COMMENT1, " AND EATEN IT ALL UP". MOVE BEARS TO BEDROOM. BEARS-IN-BEDROOM. EXAMINE BEDS, REPLACING ALL GOLDILOCKS WITH BEARS. DISPLAY "DADDY BEAR ", COMMENT2. DISPLAY "MUMMY BEAR ", COMMENT2. DISPLAY "BABY BEAR ", COMMENT2, " AND HERE SHE IS". HASTY-RETREAT. IF WINDOW IS OPEN EXIT GOLDILOCKS OTHERWISE MOVE GOLDILOCKS TO DOOR. END-OF-TALE. CLOSE STORY, DISPLAY "WOULD YOU BELIEVE CINDERELLA IN PL/I?". STOP RUN.
I love this photo, posted on Facebook recently by Mark Littlewood.
Remember Les Miserables? The show that brought you such moving and beautiful lyrics as:
I am agog!
I am aghast!
Is Marius in love at last?
I’ve never heard him `ooh’ and `aah’.
You talk of battles to be won
And here he comes like Don Ju-an
It’s better than an o-per-a!
I saw it a couple of decades ago, at the gift of a kind friend, and had a pleasant enough evening, though I’ve felt no particular desire to repeat the experience.
Well, now there’s a film, and, while I may get around to seeing it some time in the next couple of decades, I bet the process won’t be half as enjoyable as reading Matt Walsh’s review.
There once was a man from the sticks
Who liked to compose limericks.
But he failed at the sport,
For he wrote ’em too short.
I just love Tom Stoppard. Tidying up old files in old folders I came across this from Rosencrantz and Guildernstern are Dead:
R: I don’t believe in it anyway.
G: Just a conspiracy of cartographers, then?
Here’s another. They’re discussing Hamlet.
The Player: The old man thinks he’s in love with his daughter.
Rosencrantz: Good God. We’re out of our depths here.
The Player: No, no, no! He hasn’t got a daughter! The old man thinks he’s in love with his daughter.
Rosencrantz: The old man is?
The Player: Hamlet… in love… with the old man’s daughter… the old man… thinks.
More good stuff here.
One of the records that was regularly played in my childhood home was a collection of sketches by the wonderful Joyce Grenfell. This was a favourite, and though I only ever knew it as audio, the place to find such things nowadays is of course YouTube.
Internet giant Google has teamed up with the Daily Mail to develop a unique version of the online search engine which will confirm the enquirer’s prejudices.
Elton John has the reputation of writing his songs in very short periods of time. Richard E Grant puts him to the test. Quite fun.
The original YouTube video has now been removed, but you can still see the clip here.
This is probably at least partly staged, but I don’t think it’s a complete set-up.