<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tunnelling your way to the future</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.statusq.org/archives/2012/07/16/4269/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.statusq.org/archives/2012/07/16/4269/</link>
	<description>Quentin Stafford-Fraser&#039;s blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 May 2013 03:36:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: qsf</title>
		<link>http://www.statusq.org/archives/2012/07/16/4269/comment-page-1/#comment-122166</link>
		<dc:creator>qsf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2012 23:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.statusq.org/?p=4269#comment-122166</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks Kai - I&#039;m glad you liked it!

Ah yes, I should probably change the text as per your suggestion, but I tend to think of organisations as plural, as a group of people, and the packets are the things that they *are* going to send me.  You&#039;ll notice I refer to Tunnelbroker with a plural verb elsewhere in the piece.  But there&#039;s plenty of debate out there about whether singular or plural forms are more appropriate for organisations.

In this case, you&#039;re probably right, because it&#039;s really the entity that&#039;s doing the forwarding, and not a bunch of diligent workers kindly sticking new addresses on little envelopes, however much I might like to picture it that way!

In fact, now I think of it, Tunnelbroker is the service, and Hurricane Electric is the company. So yes, I should fix it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Kai &#8211; I&#8217;m glad you liked it!</p>
<p>Ah yes, I should probably change the text as per your suggestion, but I tend to think of organisations as plural, as a group of people, and the packets are the things that they *are* going to send me.  You&#8217;ll notice I refer to Tunnelbroker with a plural verb elsewhere in the piece.  But there&#8217;s plenty of debate out there about whether singular or plural forms are more appropriate for organisations.</p>
<p>In this case, you&#8217;re probably right, because it&#8217;s really the entity that&#8217;s doing the forwarding, and not a bunch of diligent workers kindly sticking new addresses on little envelopes, however much I might like to picture it that way!</p>
<p>In fact, now I think of it, Tunnelbroker is the service, and Hurricane Electric is the company. So yes, I should fix it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kai Carver</title>
		<link>http://www.statusq.org/archives/2012/07/16/4269/comment-page-1/#comment-122145</link>
		<dc:creator>Kai Carver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2012 19:55:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.statusq.org/?p=4269#comment-122145</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Amazingly clear and readable tutorial, thank you!

a tiny edit: I think you mean: &quot;the addresses that Tunnelbroker _is_ going to route to your machines&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amazingly clear and readable tutorial, thank you!</p>
<p>a tiny edit: I think you mean: &#8220;the addresses that Tunnelbroker _is_ going to route to your machines&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aideen</title>
		<link>http://www.statusq.org/archives/2012/07/16/4269/comment-page-1/#comment-120625</link>
		<dc:creator>Aideen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2012 12:59:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.statusq.org/?p=4269#comment-120625</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ah... my tiny router (TL-MR3020) probably isn&#039;t going to be up to the job then either.

I noticed that Sysadminman&#039;s TL-WR1043ND had 8MB flash. Potential purchase justification? :-)

The USB port is very useful for lots of interesting things too (sensors + owfs or mosquito/mqtt etc).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah&#8230; my tiny router (TL-MR3020) probably isn&#8217;t going to be up to the job then either.</p>
<p>I noticed that Sysadminman&#8217;s TL-WR1043ND had 8MB flash. Potential purchase justification? <img src='http://www.statusq.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>The USB port is very useful for lots of interesting things too (sensors + owfs or mosquito/mqtt etc).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: qsf</title>
		<link>http://www.statusq.org/archives/2012/07/16/4269/comment-page-1/#comment-120561</link>
		<dc:creator>qsf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jul 2012 17:36:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.statusq.org/?p=4269#comment-120561</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes, I&#039;ve been wondering about doing it that way, but the standard DD-WRT builds that will fit in the 4MB my router has available don&#039;t support IPv6. :-(]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, I&#8217;ve been wondering about doing it that way, but the standard DD-WRT builds that will fit in the 4MB my router has available don&#8217;t support IPv6. <img src='http://www.statusq.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':-(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aideen</title>
		<link>http://www.statusq.org/archives/2012/07/16/4269/comment-page-1/#comment-120409</link>
		<dc:creator>Aideen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2012 16:17:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.statusq.org/?p=4269#comment-120409</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is a great tutorial thanks.

Not having a suitably small and quiet Linux box that I want to leave on all the time, I&#039;ll probably investigate using a router and OpenWRT. A quick search for IPv6 and OpenWRT produces the following helpful pages:

http://wiki.openwrt.org/doc/howto/ipv6
http://sysadminman.net/blog/2012/ipv6-tunnel-on-openwrt-using-tunnelbroker-net-3480]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a great tutorial thanks.</p>
<p>Not having a suitably small and quiet Linux box that I want to leave on all the time, I&#8217;ll probably investigate using a router and OpenWRT. A quick search for IPv6 and OpenWRT produces the following helpful pages:</p>
<p><a href="http://wiki.openwrt.org/doc/howto/ipv6" rel="nofollow">http://wiki.openwrt.org/doc/howto/ipv6</a><br />
<a href="http://sysadminman.net/blog/2012/ipv6-tunnel-on-openwrt-using-tunnelbroker-net-3480" rel="nofollow">http://sysadminman.net/blog/2012/ipv6-tunnel-on-openwrt-using-tunnelbroker-net-3480</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
